More corona virus mysteries
That corona virus is out there and killing people is indisputable. There are just a few things that I fail to understand. For example, if one has antibodies, and they never received the antibody treatment plasma, and they are tested and prove to be coronavirus negative, why should it not be assumed that if they get infected again, they will kick out the infection just as they did the first one?
Associated with the first question is this second question: Does treating people using "donated" antibody plasma not get them "addicted" to that type of treatment and render meaningless the whole antibody treating exercise? What I mean is that a person who recovered thanks to antibody plasma or serum or whatever they call it, has NO ability to kick the virus on their own immunity response. It's like such a person is now "dependent" on the plasma, until a vaccine is made. What's more, if you subject such a person to an antibody test, they will seem to have been infected, but that will be a false positive result because the antibodies that they exhibit will have been "acquired", not "self generated".
No doubt there are people who have full understanding of the things I don't understand. Perhaps as I watch TV I will also catch up one of these days. But I really would appreciate someone commenting with an explanation of the above.
Associated with the first question is this second question: Does treating people using "donated" antibody plasma not get them "addicted" to that type of treatment and render meaningless the whole antibody treating exercise? What I mean is that a person who recovered thanks to antibody plasma or serum or whatever they call it, has NO ability to kick the virus on their own immunity response. It's like such a person is now "dependent" on the plasma, until a vaccine is made. What's more, if you subject such a person to an antibody test, they will seem to have been infected, but that will be a false positive result because the antibodies that they exhibit will have been "acquired", not "self generated".
No doubt there are people who have full understanding of the things I don't understand. Perhaps as I watch TV I will also catch up one of these days. But I really would appreciate someone commenting with an explanation of the above.
Comments
Post a Comment